A Pair of Lunatics

Todd Daugherty, N9OGL has been described as a threatening and perverse blowhard who enjoys publishing animated depictions of children being raped by adults. We have no idea why Wal-Mart in Taylorville, IL would want to keep him in their employ, but as yet they don't see the possibility of liability looming large in their future.

Mark Morgan has been described as a dimwitted liar with a penchant for repeating defamation learned under the tutelage of his Canadian sugar daddy, Karol Madera. Below, you'll find a few select quotes where Mark Morgan, KB9RQZ and Todd Daugherty, N9OGL are discussed by various and sundry at hamisland.net.


AL2N writes:

You guys can argue about this Todd fellow all you want to but the cold reality is this:

1. I do not know nor do I care to know what is going on between you all and this Todd guy.

2. After some research on this Todd fellow I can say that he is not welcome on any site that has my name attached to it. I have no assurance that he will not post the same child porn anime stuff here that he has on his blog. Such stuff is vile (there I said it too) and calling it art or free speech will not change that. Sick is sick. The Supreme Court just ruled that such stuff is NOT protected speech. Till that changes I am not going to take the risk of having him here. The moderators are on notice to ban him on sight.

3. If his IP was banned, it was because he either logged in under some unknown name and made some trouble, he was using a pirated call, or his IP is recognized by the forum software as a known spammer or other such location and blocked automatically.

You can now go back to your debate....


From KV1M (to Mark Morgan) on Sun May 18, 2008 5:31 pm

Hey Mark, quit stalking Paul already.

Todd has FCC trouble all on his own and I'm none to sympathetic to it myself. You wanna follow around Paul and post endlessly long rants about nothing then you might find yourself:

A) On everyones ignore list

B) Target number one to get you to melt down and get yourself banned so we don't have to deal with that kind of nuttiness.


From KB1OHK (to Mark) on Tue May 20, 2008 11:59 am

Mark's definition of the word libel is; Libel n., any statement that Mark doesn't agree with.


From KV1M (to Mark) on Tue May 20, 2008 2:06 pm

Finally, the thread returns.

Hey Mark, I got your rebuttal right here.

So you DO know the issue at hand with Todd then and tried to pretend there was no issue. And you think enforcement of the regs is being vindictive? You are a real piece of work.

I am most certainly not going to ignore you, I am going to go out of my way to make you look like the fool you are until I am told to stop by management or you get yourself banned.

If you climb the hell down and quite acting the fool and nutter then I'll leave you be, but I really don't see that happening since you have shown yourself to be a complete loon in the past already.

So fire away nutter, I'm in some kind of mood for conflict.


From KV1M (to Mark) on Tue May 20, 2008 3:55 pm

You're a freaking loon is what you are. Re read your own posts, they contain exactly what I say they do. You should know by now that if I am coming after you it is because you are being a nutter and a loon.

Have you stopped taking your meds or something? The stench of paranoia coming from you is hard to miss.

Nobody here give a rats a** enough about you to DOS or TOS you, maybe your loony-ness has made you some friends elsewhere.


From N4AUD on Wed May 21, 2008 8:04 am

AD4MG wrote:

I'm pretty much a heathen, myself, but I have to agree with Mike. Many will find what Todd posts on his own private site very offensive, legal or not. Having raised two sons, I believe our children are our greatest treasure, and should not be depicted in such a manner. Anyone may disagree with me until time ends, and I'm OK with that.

But, seeing as this is a private site, and the owner has made his preference known, my support is firmly behind him on this matter. Todd's site is available for all to view, if one desires to do so. But it won't happen here. Not on our watch.

Let's put it plainly.

Todd posts child pornography on the internet. He can call it anything he wants, but graphic representations of prepubescent children in sexual situations IS child pornography. It doesn't have to be actual pictures of real children, Todd's little cartoons qualify as well. I have no use for anyone who enjoys that kind of crap or anyone who defends someone who enjoys that kind of crap. It's not about free speech, it's about perverts lusting after children. Todd calls it "fantasy" and in my opinion anyone who uses such images to fuel their sexual fantasies will eventually turn to real children.

I have no use for Todd.

If I have violated the TOS for this site please feel free to ban me, but I won't apologize or say anything good about a pervert. If all these threads about this guy will go away, I'll never mention it again but I find it difficult to remain silent when we have multiple threads about this guy.

From KB1OHK (to Mark) on Wed May 21, 2008 7:55 pm

kb9rqz wrote:

yes I am I merely paying a slight price for doing what I see as right and moral frankly that gives one hell of a laod of endorphines so feel to keep it up and I trust the mods to keep in line

Right and moral, are you serious?

You slander people on your childish blog, falsely report innocent people to CPS and law enforcement agencies, defend pedophiles and terrorists, verbally attack anyone you disagree with, and you have the nerve to call your behavior moral!

Now we can all sit back and watch Mark attempt to turn the tables. Mark will now deny all of my accusations and then say I am the one doing what he is being accused of!

He might even accuse me of libel.


From KB1OHK (to Mark) on Wed May 21, 2008 10:11 pm

Right and moral, are you serious?

You slander people on your childish blog, falsely report innocent people to CPS and lawenforcement agencies, defend pedophiles and terrorists, verbally attack anyone you disagree with, and you have the nerve to call your behavior moral!

OGL posts pedophilia on his blog and you defend him.

KFM makes terroristic statements and you defend him.

LAF asked about your antenna and you attacked him.

You accused a few amateurs of sex crimes involving children and reported them to CPS without any proof.

I did not libel you, please learn what the word means.

My moral standards happen to be very high, but yours seem to be non-existent.

You are truly a wretched man.


N1LAF (to Mark) on Wed May 21, 2008 10:20 pm

Lets talk about making mistakes. Was the Island down for security reasons? TOSed? Nooooo. What were you thinking? You think this kind of public statement isn't going to get peoples attention? You think you can get away from false accusations by using weasel words as 'I do wonder' and 'merely speculation'? What were you thinking? Do you hold yourself accountable for your own statements? You go and smear names around as some kind of troublemaker that you are. Do you really take us for fools, who do you think your fooling? The point is, the Island board had a software glitch, and you took the occasion to use it as a weapon. Shame on you!

I am done with you, back on the 'Foe' list!


KB1OHK (to Mark) on Wed May 21, 2008 10:43 pm

No, the statements I am making are 100% true. In my opinion, and the opinion of many others, you're nothing more than a pathological liar.

You reported several hams based on nothing. The truth is they made you mad and that was your way of retaliating.

Everyone sees you for what you are...A LIAR and you're not very good at it!


KB1OHK (to Mark) on Wed May 21, 2008 11:35 pm

It's pointless trying to explain the situation to you. You lack the ability to logically reason. Based on my observations you lack the ability to even reason on a remedial level.

Your ignorant off the wall ramblings combined with your illiteracy make reading your posts a painful chore. Do yourself a favor, invest in a spell check program. Also, please learn to punctuate.

I am done. I wish to debate with you no further.


WV6Z (about Mark) on Thu May 22, 2008 1:40 am

Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.


KV1M (to Mark) on Thu May 22, 2008 6:04 am kb9rqz wrote: You have made threats against and seem follwoing me around in the online world that is stalking

KV1M wrote:

See, that's what I'm on at you about. Where have I EVER interacted with you ANYWHERE else than this one single thread? Where? Face it, you are delusional and need to seek help.


AL2N (to Mark) on Thu May 22, 2008 7:16 am RQZ,

I will make you an offer. You are defending this Todd fellow and say that his IP has been banned. I have reactivated a number of accounts that were at zero posts and his was in the mix. Now, if you will give me his IP address, I would be willing to unban it and let this guy have his say one one condition- You assume responsibility for him. If he steps out of line and gets himself banned, you go with him.

Are you willing to be accountable for him and have him come on the forum to have his say? If so, give me the IP address and I will unblock it if indeed it is actually blocked. So far no one has given the IP address, all I have heard is complaining.


KB1OHK to Mark) on Thu May 22, 2008 12:12 pm

kb9rqz wrote:

on further thought IF you in fact belive I eported the hams I di becuase the anoyed or offened me, why do you risk the same treatment after all If I lacked any ethics in the is matter why would I treat you or N1LAF any better


I received an email stating that you're posting about me on a site called nimbusters. I guess in your mind that's ethical. However, seeing as how I found the site to be rather offensive, I won't be responding there. So how is that treating me any better than your so called (imaginary) foes? Btw, if I did the same you would be crying slander.

kb9rqz wrote:

I don't belive even you belive what you are accusing me off since to do so and proceed to atack me could eaisly result in your being next for such treatement to do so you would have to be stupid and I don't think you are or N1LAF are that stupid, indeed rember to make such a report I would not even have to give my name or any contact info I could do so in complete safety therefore

KB1OHK: I never attacked you, you perceive every statement as an attack against you. I guess that's how you make yourself feel important, but the rest of us consider you to be delusional and paranoid.

The answer to your question is, I am not worried, because I could care less if you reported me to any authority. I know your baseless accusations wouldn't go very far, but feel free to do so. The choice is yours.

kb9rqz wrote:

one the the interesting results of this 10 years harrassment is I know just what I could do and what I could not get away with my foes have taught me well. only one things prevents me from using that knowledge.... that is MY sense of morals the evidence of my morality is plain to see has CPS vsited N1LAF willt hey visit YOU sir


Based on your past actions, and on some of the statements you have made, I wouldn't be surprised if I did get a visit from CPS, or some other agency.

Like I said, go for it! I have nothing to hide. I am an upstanding, law abiding citizen, no worries on this end.